Liberty in Interpretation

June 7, 2011

“Both sides are faced with difficult texts. I am disturbed by the excessive dogmatism of those who claim that only one view is biblical. I plead for a greater humility of judgement. We evangelical people need to give one another liberty in areas in which Scripture is not absolutely plain. F F Bruce wrote to me in 1989 that ‘annihilation is certainly an acceptable interpretation of the relevant New Testament passages’. He added, ‘For myself, I remain agnostic’. My position is similar.”

John Stott, John Stott A Global Ministry, IVP 2001, p. 354

I couldn’t agree more. Many in the more “hell-exists-and-if-you-don’t-believe-in-it-you-will-go-there” circles approve of both Stott and Bruce. Somehow they overlook the fact that both of these men were not very concerned with knowing exactly how God was going to figure out eternity.

I think the church, and the blogosphere, would be better places if everyone was more agnostic about these type of things and more dogmatic about things like Jesus being the only way to the Father.

Is the New Testament the Complete Blueprint for the Church?

June 5, 2011

Although what follows was written more than a century ago it is still represents the viewpoint of many in the church today:

“When Moses was in the mount with God, he was shown a pattern of the tabernacle, and he also received instructions on how each part of it was to be made. Not one single pin or knop was omitted in the Divine instructions, and Moses was repeatedly told to adhere strictly to them, in all their details (Exod. xxv. 40; xxvi. 30). The house was God’s, and he ordered it. Moses, as a faithful servant, obeyed. It would be well for us to-day if all the servants of Christ would remember that the Lord has not been less careful about the building of His Church. He has given the Divine pattern and the most minute instructions as to how His house on earth is to be ordered (see 1 Cor.; 1 Tim). This abides, the unrepealed, unchanging will of God for His people’s obedience throughout the whole of the Church’s earthly history, until the Lord comes.”

John Ritchie, The Tabernacle in the Wilderness, p. 12

“We are not told of what material the pillars were made; we need not therefore pry into God’s secrets, or seek to be wise where He has been silent. The silence signifies that they are something to be looked away from.”

John Ritchie, The Tabernacle in the Wilderness, p. 19

I get scared when someone says that the New Testament is to the Church what the Old Testament was to the Israelites. That comparison trivializes the role of the Spirit. Instead of our constant companion and comforter and guide he becomes simply someone who interprets scripture. Many act as if the Bible itself is our true comfort and companion. Any amount of time spent in Christian circles will reveal that the majority of professing Christians constantly substitute the Bible for the Spirit, though they may not realize it.

Discussing the full role of the Spirit is a blog for another day. Right now I want to address the flawed thinking in these quotes. The first quote suggests that all of the guidelines for the church are contained in the New Testament, just as all of the details of the Tabernacle were contained in the instructions given to Moses. In the second quote Ritchie admits that all of the details for the Tabernacle were not given, but uses the excuse that the pillars are “to be looked away from”.

Fair enough, the pillars may not be significant. Unfortunately when the same type of logic is applied to the New Testament what we end up with is the idea that the Church can only practice things that are clearly prescribed in scripture. I could write volumes on the problems with this, but suffice it to say that those who claim to practice it are hypocrites. To exclusively look to scripture as our only guide, without accepting new inspirations from the Spirit, would be to live in a very wooden and culturally nonsensical way.

Every detail for how we should live and organize ourselves in the church is not found in the scripture. Don’t get me wrong, many details are found, and I want to spend my life aligning more and more closely with those details by the power of the Spirit. But where details are not found we cannot use the cop-out of “not…pry[ing] into God’s secrets”; to do so would be to deny the Spirit’s role in guiding us moment by moment, in the big decisions and the small.

Epic Soundtracks for Epic Lives

June 4, 2011

Every now and then I daydream about what it would have been like to live in the times of knights and quests, of castles and longbows. More and more, though, I am realizing that the world is still a place for adventures and heroism.

Hollywood movies may exaggerate the importance of specific individuals in historical triumphs of good over evil, but a grain of truth is hidden beyond the makeup and special effects. One life can make a difference; one life lived in relentless sacrifice, in reckless passion, in the death of an individual and the rebirth of a recreation who values others more highly than themselves, even to the point of death.

More and more I think of the Bible as a majestic, epic story. Not in the trite Sunday school ‘History is His-story’ sense, but in a way that marvels at how God is weaving all of time together into a culmination in which the broken and tainted universe will be restored to a state greater than its original splendour.

I long for the day that:

“the land will be as full
of the knowledge of God
as the sea is filled with water”

The writings of Isaiah

I never want that longing to turn into a tepid, impotent longing; a longing that does little more than dream of better days to come. I want that longing to spur me into playing a part in ushering in the Kingdom. I often listen to epic songs as I meditate on the story of God, and my place within it. I am inspired to risk more as the Spirit reveals a deeper understanding of the heroism of Jesus, the heroism that he calls us to fully emulate.

I encourage you to listen to the following with an open mind and an open heart, letting the Spirit direct your thoughts and emotions, magnifying Jesus as well as inspiring a greater sense of involvement in the majestic saga that is the eternal purpose of God.

  

Fire-hoses to Fountains (aka: making do without the Spirit)

May 31, 2011

Recently an idea took root in my brain. The more I think about it, the more it morphs, expands, and incorporates many previous thoughts and observations. I am going to try and explain this idea as simply as possible, and in following posts I will chase it down the many rabbit trails it is spawning in my mind.

These quotes form the backbone of the idea as I now understand it.

“Everyone who drinks from this water will get thirsty again. But whoever drinks from the water that I will give him will never get thirsty again—ever! In fact, the water I will give him will become a well of water springing up within him for eternal life.”

-Jesus, to the Samaritan woman at the well

“My people have committed a double evil:
They have abandoned Me,
the fountain of living water,
and dug cisterns for themselves,
cracked cisterns that cannot hold water”

-God, speaking to Jeremiah

It seems to me that Jesus – through the Spirit – provides the sustaining life-force, the water, that every follower of his, and every gathering of those followers, requires to live in complete joy and peace. This water provides the power to go into the world and spread love, splashing life-giving drops on the parched lips and cracked skin of those who have never heard of and experienced the source of all zoe, Jesus himself.

The Spirit provides this zoe-water free of any charge, in unlimited supply. There is only one catch: those receiving it have to be open to receiving it. Whatever the Calvinists might say, the Spirit never imposes anything on us, he only offers it. This is where the problem begins – individuals, or communities, can experience the fire-hose of love and life that is the Spirit, and then they can turn around and shut him off. This is what the dude who wrote Hebrews was talking about when he said that people could share the Spirit and then still reject him.

Any community of Jesus-followers can experience the awesome power of the fire-hose of love and peace and joy that is the Spirit. Whenever true revival (or vival) breaks out this is what is happening; God is unleashing the immensely constructive force of zoe-water by the Spirit, through the channel of the individuals open to his filling. During these times individuals live in joy, and are compelled to bring that joy to everyone they encounter.

Unfortunately, we mortals can make the fateful choice of switching off the zoe-water of the Spirit. Once this happens, as individuals or communities, the fire-hose is re-engineered into a fountain. As the above photo shows, the previously outward facing hoses are turned inward. The zoe-water source has been switched off, so the remaining water must be preserved, rationed, and recirculated. Unfortunately, what those who begin to construct fountains do not understand is that the zoe-water instantly turns to normal water when the source is disconnected. Much like the healing powers of Rapunzel’s hair disappeared when it was cut, so the zoe-water that remains when the Spirit is disconnected turns out to be nothing but regular H2O.

The differences between the fire-hose and the fountain are legion. The fire-hose was portable, the fountain is stationary. The fire-hose brings life to those immobilized by the powers of darkness, the fountain waits for those who seek healing to come to it (though when they come, they come in vain). The waters of the fire-hose are potentially limitless, the waters of the fountain have a definite fixed volume. The waters of the fire-hose are fresh and new, provided moment by moment by the Spirit, the waters of the fountain become stagnant and stale, even more so when the hapless attendees of the fountain attempt to bathe in them. Most signifigant of all, the zoe-water of the fire-hose is saturated with God’s life-giving nature – the water in the fountain is nothing but a liquid placebo, a cheap fake that cannot satisfy.

“Cleaning our room”

April 26, 2011

A while back I watched this neat video of Francis Chan speaking at some conference and shared it with a couple like-minded friends, who all loved it. If you have a couple minutes check it out, if you only have a couple seconds read these quotes:

“There’s this weird new road we created where you can just do some good things in the name of Jesus”

“Remember “Simon says”? … “Jesus says” is a totally different game. If Jesus says something you just have to memorize it. That’s what we do in the church. If Jesus says something you just have to study it.”

Just recently my buddy Matt Cook expanded on the “cleaning” idea, and his story is well worth a read!

“There are people … [who] belong to Christ without knowing it”

April 16, 2011

All the fuss about Rob Bell when C. S. Lewis beat him to the punch decades ago. The majority of people pissed at Bell love Lewis, which is a little ironic. Wait, I think I remember something about the children of people who killed prophets honoring the prophets of old but continuing to kill the current ones, but that`s a topic for another day:

‎”The world does not consist of 100 percent Christians & 100 percent non-Christians. There are people who are slowly ceasing to be Christian but still call themselves by that name…There are other people who are slowly becoming Christians though they do not yet call themselves so. There are people who do not accept the full Christian doctrine about Christ but who are so strongly attracted by him that they are his in a much deeper sense than they themselves understand. There are people in other religions who are being led by God’s secret influence to concentrate on those parts of their religion which are in agreement with Christianity & who thus belong to Christ without knowing it. For example, a Buddhist of good will may be led to concentrate more and more on the Buddhist teaching about mercy and to leave in the background (though he might still say he believed) the Buddhist teaching on certain other points.”

(178 – Mere Christianity)

-C. S. Lewis

Tozer on Regret

March 18, 2011

I ran into this great piece by Tozer the other day, and thought it fitting for the first post here to be something that was truly helpful and wise (as opposed to the upcoming posts based on my limited wisdom):

“The human heart is heretical by nature. Popular religious beliefs should be checked carefully against the word of God, for they are almost certain to be wrong.

Legalism, for instance, is natural to the human heart. Grace in its true New Testament meaning is foreign to human reason, not because it is contrary to reason but because it lies beyond it. The doctrine of grace had to be revealed; it could not have been discovered.

The essence of legalism is self-atonement. The seeker tries to make himself acceptable to God by some act of restitution, or by self-punishment or the feeling of regret. The desire to be pleasing to God by self-effort is not, for it assumes that sin once done may be undone, an assumption wholly false.

Long after we have learned from the scriptures that we cannot by fasting, or the wearing of hair shirt or the making of many prayers, atone for the sins of the soul, we still tend by a kind of pernicious natural heresy to feel that we can please God and purify our souls by the penance of perpetual regret.

This latter is the Protestant’s unacknowledged penance. Though he claims to believe in the doctrine of justification by faith he still secretly feels that what he calls “godly sorrow” will make him dear to God. Though he may know better he is caught in the web of a wrong religious feeling and betrayed.

There is indeed a godly sorrow that worketh repentance and it must be acknowledged that among us Christians this feeling is often not present in sufficient strength to work real repentance; but the persistence of this sorrow till it becomes chronic regret is neither right nor good. Regret is a kind of frustrated repentance that has not been quite comsummated. Once the soul has turned from all sin and committed itself wholly to God there is no longer any legitimate place for regret. When moral innocence has been restored by the forgiving love of God the guilt may be remembered, but the sting is gone from the memory. The forgiven man knows that he has sinned, but he no longer feels it.

The effort to be forgiven by works is one that can never be completed because no one knows or can know how much is enough to cancel out the offence; so the seeker must go on year after year paying on his moral debt, here a little, there a little, knowing that he sometimes adds to his bill much more than he pays. The task of keeping books on such transactions can never end, and the seeker can only hope that when the last entry is made he may be ahead and the account fully paid. This is quite the popular belief, this forgiveness by self-effort but it is natural heresy and can at last only betray those who depend upon it.

It may be argued that the absence of regret indicates a low and inadequate view of sin, but the exact opposite is true. Sin is frightful, so destructive to the soul that no human thought or act can in any degree diminish its lethal effects. Only God can deal with it successfully; only the blood of Christ can cleanse it from the pores or the spirit. The heart that has been delivered from this dread enemy feels not regret but wondrous relief and unceasing gratitude.

The returned prodigal honours his father more by rejoicing than by repining. Had the young man in the story had less faith in his father he might have mourned in a corner instead of joining in the festivities. His confidence in the loving-kindness of his father gave him the courage to forget his chequered past.

Regret frets the soul as tension frets the nerves and anxiety the mind. I believe that the chronic unhappiness of most Christians may be attributed to a gnawing uneasiness lest God had not fully forgiven them, or the fear that He expects as the price of His forgiveness some sort of emotional penance which they have not furnishes. As our confidence in the goodness of God mounts our anxieties will diminish and our moral happiness rise in inverse proportion.

Regret may be more than a form of self-love. A man may have such a high regard for himself that any failure to live up to his own image of himself disappoints him deeply. He feels that he has betrayed his better self by his act of wrongdoing, and even if God is willing to forgive him he will not forgive himself. Sin brings to such a man a painful loss of face that is not soon forgotten. He becomes permanently angry with himself by going to God frequently with petulant self-accusations. This state of mind crystallizes finally into a feeling of chronic regret which appears to be proof of deep penitence but is actually proof of deep self-love.

Regret for a sinful past will remain until we truly believe that for us in Christ that sinful past no longer exists. The man in Christ has only Christ’s past and that is perfect and acceptable to God. In Christ He died, in Christ he rose, and in Christ he is seated within the circe of God’s favoured ones. He is no longer angry with himself because he is no longer self-regarding, but Christ-regarding; hence there is no place for regret.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.